Will Atfield

Clayton Utz
Partner Melbourne

Recognised by peers as one to watch in Class Action Litigation

– Best Lawyers Australia

Overview

Will is a commercial litigator specialising in class actions and complex disputes. He acts for clients across the automotive, pharmaceutical and medical device, and food and beverage sectors.

His practice focuses on product liability and Australian Consumer Law issues, including emerging risks associated with artificial intelligence-enabled products and services. He regularly advises on regulatory exposure, litigation risk and dispute strategy.

Will leverages artificial intelligence and advanced technologies in dispute resolution to manage complex data, streamline processes and deliver efficient, commercially focused outcomes.

Notable Work
  • Philips Electronics Australia: Will is acting for Philips in a class action relating to named CPAP and BiPAP devices for the treatment of sleep apnoea, which are also the subject of a global recall and associated regulatory investigations. The defence team has achieved an outcome where the Applicant side is now applying to the court for the Court's permission to discontinue the class action against Philips.

  • Bayer: acts in a class action commenced in the Victorian Supreme Court relating to the Essure contraceptive device.

  • Volkswagen Group: Will was part of a core team that defended Volkswagen Group in five class actions in the Federal Court of Australia, brought by two plaintiff law firms on behalf of vehicle owners and the ACCC in relation to diesel emissions and regulatory issues.

  • Johnson & Johnson: Will was part of the core team that defended Johnson & Johnson Medical Pty Ltd and two overseas manufacturing entities a class action in the Federal Court of Australia. The class action involved allegations of complications relating to surgical mesh and tape products. The hearing ran for more than 85 sitting days over more than seven months.

  • Product liability and product safety advisory practice: Will regularly provides advice to Australian and overseas clients in a range of industries on product liability, product safety and recall issues and the Australian Consumer Law, including issues in relation to lithium ion batteries. These issues include safety defect provisions and mandatory standards, set-up, notification and management of voluntary product recalls, mandatory notifications of serious injury, illness or death, and consumer guarantees. As part of this work, Will is experienced in liaising with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission as well as State and Territory regulators across Australia.

  • Australian Consumer Law: Acts for Australian and overseas clients in product liability, product safety and recall issues under the Australian Consumer Law.

  • A tool manufacturer: Acted to recall multiple consumer goods that present a potential safety risk in Australia and New Zealand, and to design and implement a remediation scheme for products sold business-to-business.

  • Automotive product liability: Acts for Australian and international motor vehicle manufacturers with regards to product liability and owner care issues.

  • Global consumer electronics company: Will acts for a market-leading global Silicon Valley consumer electronics company in relation to a number of product liability proceedings in the County Court of Victoria. The proceedings include claims that the relevant products are defective and caused personal injury.

  • Make-up and skincare products manufacturer: Acts for a market-leading manufacturer in relation to product liability and regulatory compliance issues.

  • Dust Diseases claims: Acts for clients in the defence of dust diseases claims in the Victorian Supreme Court and the NSW Dust Diseases Tribunal, especially those associated with occupational exposure to asbestos.

  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia: Acted in its response to the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.

Insights
Falling flat: Supreme Court of Victoria rejects ratcheted Group Costs Order
18 Dec 2025 | Article
Read Insights
Wage underpayment class actions: How to prepare for what is coming next
26 Nov 2025 | Article
Read Insights
Fitness for purpose in a different sense: is the Australian Consumer Law prepared for AI-enabled goods and services?
13 Nov 2025 | Article
Read Insights
Certainty for class action funders as High Court greenlights common fund orders, but plaintiff firms miss out
6 Aug 2025 | Article
Read Insights
High Court clarifies the availability of pre-mediation class closure: Lendlease v Pallas
25 Jun 2025 | Article
Read Insights
Media release: Clayton Utz promotes eight to partnership
6 Dec 2024 | Media Release
Read Insights
Class action payday: decoding funding payment trends
10 Sep 2024 | Article
Read Insights
CFOs are no longer UFOs: Galactic class action is good to go with its common fund order
23 May 2024 | Article
Read Insights
New product standards for furniture: navigating the new regime to address toppling furniture
21 May 2024 | Article
Read Insights
Class closure in NSW: gone but not forgotten?
21 May 2024 | Article
Read Insights
Justice in the class action context: recent developments in litigation funding
24 Nov 2023 | Article
Read Insights
"Soft class closure" orders increase the chance of settlement at mediation
20 Oct 2023 | Article
Read Insights
The ACCC's product safety focus for 2023-24: consumers online, sustainability and infant safety
19 Jul 2023 | Article
Read Insights
Litigation funders watching for certainty on common fund orders in class actions
30 Mar 2023 | Article
Read Insights
The Western Australian class action regime is now live
30 Mar 2023 | Article
Read Insights
High Court ruling on foreign residents as group members in Australian class actions raises practical issues for respondents
12 Oct 2022 | Article
Read Insights
Western Australia opts in to new state class action regime
26 Sep 2022 | Article
Read Insights
The ACCC's product safety priorities for 2022/2023 – "Protecting Tomorrow's Consumers Today"
24 Jun 2022 | Article
Read Insights
Can class action reform be expected from the new Labor Government - not a question of "if", but "when"?
26 May 2022 | Article
Read Insights
Does the limitation clock tick on after an abandoned class action? The Federal Court has its say
12 May 2022 | Article
Read Insights
After 30 years, class action regime still plagued with uncertainty
7 Mar 2022 | Article
Read Insights
Supreme Court of Victoria grants first successful application to secure contingency fee class action funding arrangement
3 Mar 2022 | Article
Read Insights
First contingency fee decision is another example of court discretion over funding class actions
28 Oct 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Countdown continues until strict button battery standards become mandatory
22 Jul 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Reforming Australia’s litigation funding and class actions 06: Common Fund Orders and legislative reform
27 May 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Door shut for declassing motion in Richmond Valley Council v Jardine Lloyd Thompson
29 Apr 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Product safety 101: Managing a recall to avoid crisis management
15 Apr 2021 | Article
Read Insights
The ACCC's product safety focus in 2021: bikes, babies and button batteries included
1 Apr 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Reforming Australia's litigation funding and class actions 02: increased regulation of litigation funding
18 Mar 2021 | Article
Read Insights
Class actions in Australia
17 Dec 2020 | Article
Read Insights
Common ground on common fund orders in class actions?
26 Nov 2020 | Article
Read Insights
Contingency fees now available for class actions in the Victorian Supreme Court, so expect more class actions
19 Jun 2020 | Article
Read Insights
The divergence in the acceptance of Common Fund Orders continues post-Brewster – where to next?
28 May 2020 | Article
Read Insights
Soft closure mis-deploys: another hurdle for class action settlements?
23 Apr 2020 | Article
Read Insights
Find other people to support you
Find People